Tuesday, July 27, 2010
In the beginning there were the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. At the forefront of these parties in early days were the nation's first treasury secretary Alexander Hamilton (federalist) and president Thomas Jefferson (d-republican). By knowing even a little about the fundamental principles of these two parties, it's easy to see that the rift separating America's two primary political groups has been in place even since the birth of our Republic.
I found a simple side-by-side comparison chart of the differences between Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian government systems and found it to be very accurate, yet simple and concise. I would emphasize that the biggest cause for disagreement even today, seems to be that both sides simply view the Constitution differently, and most importantly the Bill of Rights.
Check it out for yourself, and understand more about the differences in our party system today.
(side by side chart here)
Jeffersonians, for the most part, were artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, or owners of small farms in the interior regions of the South and West.
ATTITUDE TOWARDS GOVERNMENT
Jeffersonians favored a form of government that was more democratic than that of England.
Jeffersonians thought that the common people were capable of self-government. They wanted to establish a small property owner's democracy.
Jeffersonians desired to increase the opportunities for the common people to participate in government by lowering voting qualifications.
Jeffersonians favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution to limit the powers of the central government and conserve state rights.
Jeffersonians wanted to reduce the number of federal officeholders.
Jeffersonians favored freedom of speech and press.
secretary of state,
letter to George Washington
September 9, 1792
"That...[internal] dissensions have taken place is certain, and even among those who are nearest to you in the administration. To no one they gien deeper concern than myself...
"That I have utterly, in my private conversations, disapproved of the system of the Secretary of the Treasury [i.e. Hamilton's economic program], I acknowledge and avow; and this was not merely a speculative difference. His system flowed from principles adverse to liberty, and was calculated to undermine and demolish the Republic, by creating an influence of his department over the members of the legislature. I saw his influence actually produced, and its first fruits to be the establishment of the great outlines of his project by the votes of the very persons who, having swallowed his bait, were laying themselves out to profit by his plans..."
letter to Phillip Mazzei of Italy
"The aspect of our politics has wonderfully changed since you left us. In place of that noble love of liberty, and republican government which carried us triumphantly through the war, an Anglican monarchical, and aristocratical party has sprung up, whose avowed object is to draw over us the substance, as they have already done the forms, of the British government. The main body of our citizens, however, remain true to their republican principles; the whole landed interest is republican, and so is a great mass of talents. Against us are the Executive, the Judiciary, two out of three branches of the legislature, all the officers of the government, all who want to be officers, all timid men who prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of liberty, British merchants and Americans trading on British [capital], speculators and holders in the banks and public funds..."
Hamiltonians, for the most part, were merchants, bankers, manufacturers, or professional men from New England and the Atlantic seaboard, along with some wealthy farmers and southern planters.
ATTITUDE TOWARD GOVERNMENT
Hamiltonians admired the English aristocracy and the English system of government and wished to ssee it used as a model.
Hamiltonians considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government.
Hamiltonians desired high voting qualifications, claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy.
Hamiltonians favored a broad interpretation of the Constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of of state's rights.
Hamiltonians wanted an expanding bureaucracy.
Hamiltonians, under certain circumstances, favored restrictions on speech and the press.
secretary of the treasury,
letter to Colonel Edward Carrington of Virginia
May 26, 1792
"it was not till the last session [of Congress] that I become unequivocally convinced of the following truth: 'That Mr. Madison, cooperating with Mr. Jefferson [the secretary of state], is at the head of the faction decidedly hostile to me and my administration; and actuated by views, in my judgment, subversive of the principles of good government and dangerous to the Union, peace, and happiness of the country.'
"In respect to foreign politics, the views of these gentlemen are, in my judgment,...unsound and dangerous. They have a womanish attachment to France and a womanish resentment against Great Britain. They would draw us into the closest embrace of the former, and involve us in all the consequences of her politics; and they would risk the peace of the country in their endeavors to keep us at the greatest possible distance from the latter...Various circumstances prove to me that if these gentlemen were left to pursue their own course, there would be, in less than six months, an open war between the United States and Great Britain.
"A word on another point. I am told that serious apprehensions are disseminated in your state [Virginia] as to the existence of a monarchical party meditating the destruction of State and republican government. If it is possible that so absurd an idea can gain ground, it is necessary that it should be combated. I assure you, on my private faith and honor as a man, that there is not, in my judgment, a shadow of foundation for it. A very small number of men indeed may entertain theories less republican than Mr. Jefferson and Mr. Madison, but I am persuaded there is not a man among them who would not regard as both criminal and visionary any attempt to subvert the republican system of the country."
Thomas Jefferson had a vision of every man working to earn a living for himself and his family. It was this man's right and responsibility to see after his security and his welfare. The government only exists to provide a few fundamental needs such as border security and common currency. Jefferson knew that throughout history governments always lead to tyranny as they gain more and more power, and through finance and corruption, external entities can take hold to their own ends.
If I can assign a term to Jefferson, I'd consider him "the anti-tyrant". in laying the foundation of our country, he put more emphasis on preventing the seed of tyranny than any he did any other goal. He had studied historically how governments were corrupted and the terrible effects this had on the rights of citizens. With every written word and act of legislation, he fought against any loopholes in the formation of the Constitution that would have allowed the government to grow too large.
Alexander Hamilton was of a different path altogether. A strong advocate of the British monarchy style of government, Hamilton had much lighter convictions against the tyrannical rule of King George. In fact, at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, Hamilton proposed a plan for government that included a president that would hold office for life; a king of sorts. This plan was not considered as an option.
If you've spent more than a moment on my blog, you know how I feel about the Rothschilds, the Bank of England, Federal Reserve, and big banks in general. Historically, they are the root of all tyranny and the evil preceding it. Hamilton setup the American branch of the bank of England in 1791 under the name "First Bank of the United States", owned by Nathan Rothschild. The story of the evils of the banks can be seen here.
Hamilton was a traitor to his countrymen, a calculating agent of foreign business and banking interests (primarily the Rothschild/Bank of England cartel), and through his Illuminati backing was able to infiltrate our nation at birth, as a virus injected into a newborn. His Federalist party represented the interest of the very tyrants from which Jefferson and others sought freedom for themselves and future generations. And it was his party, and the values held within it, that still divides the country from its constitutional values today.
I think understanding that our Democrat and Republican parties came from these two men in our nation's infancy, and knowing these two men intimately, we can understand far better the problems set before us today.
Friday, July 23, 2010
"Albert Pike was born on December 29, 1809, in Boston, and was the oldest of six children born to Benjamin and Sarah Andrews Pike. He studied at Harvard, and later served as a Brigadier-General in the Confederate Army. After the Civil War, Pike was found guilty of treason and jailed, only to be pardoned by fellow Freemason President Andrew Johnson on April 22, 1866, who met with him the next day at the White House. On June 20, 1867, Scottish Rite officials conferred upon Johnson the 4th to 32nd Freemasonry degrees, and he later went to Boston to dedicate a Masonic Temple.
Pike was said to be a genius, able to read and write in 16 different languages, although I cannot find a record anywhere of what those languages were. In addition, he is widely accused of plagiarism, so take with a pinch of salt. At various stages of his life we was a poet, philosopher, frontiersman, soldier, humanitarian and philanthropist. A 33rd degree Mason, he was one of the founding fathers, and head of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, being the Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry from 1859 and retained that position until his death in 1891. In 1869, he was a top leader in the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan."
I have covered briefly in other posts on this blog the link between freemasonry and the foundation of the United States. I haven't gone into great detail, but perhaps I will one day, as the ties are innumberable and impressive. Albert Pike is one of the great figures in our nation's history who represents such a link. The only confederate general honored with a statue in Washington D.C. The leader of Scottish Rite Freemasonry in North America in his time, and highest ranking Satanist in the world.
When we look at the events which have unfolded over the last 100 years, especially pertaining to war, we might find it interesting that Pike fortold with frightening accuracy, much of what would later take place, including a third world war which has not quite come to pass. I'll cover his other ties in another post, but for now, have a look at his plan for three world wars, and ask yourself: How much power do the Illuminati and Freemasons really have in this world?
(Left: Masonic designed into the very infrastructure of Washington D.C.)
Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Giusseppe Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place.
An Italian revolutionary leader, Mazzini (1805-1872), a 33rd degree Mason, was selected by the Illuminati to head their worldwide operations in 1834. (Mazzini also founded the Mafia in 1860). Because of Mazzini's revolutionary activities in Europe, the Bavarian government cracked down on the Illuminati and other secret societies for allegedly plotting a massive overthrow of Europe's monarchies. As the secrets of the Illuminati were revealed, they were persecuted and eventually disbanded, only to re-establish themselves in the depths of other organizations, of which Freemasonry was one.
Following are extracts of the letter, showing how Three World Wars have been planned for many generations.
"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions."
Students of history will recognize that the political alliances of England on one side and Germany on the other, forged between 1871 and 1898 by Otto von Bismarck, co-conspirator of Albert Pike, were instrumental in bringing about the First World War.
"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm."
After this Second World War, Communism was made strong enough to begin taking over weaker governments. In 1945, at the Potsdam Conference between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, a large portion of Europe was simply handed over to Russia, and on the other side of the world, the aftermath of the war with Japan helped to sweep the tide of Communism into China.
(Readers who argue that the terms Nazism and Zionism were not known in 1871 should remember that the Illuminati invented both these movements. In addition, Communism as an ideology, and as a coined phrase, originates in France during the Revolution. In 1785, Restif coined the phrase four years before revolution broke out. Restif and Babeuf, in turn, were influenced by Rousseau - as was the most famous conspirator of them all, Adam Weishaupt.)
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
Since the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, world events, and in particular in the Middle East, show a growing unrest and instability between Modern Zionism and the Arabic World. This is completely in line with the call for a Third World War to be fought between the two, and their allies on both sides. This Third World War is still to come, and recent events show us that it is not far off.
We exist today in a society that shuns any idea that might involve the existence of secret societies, or the motives within those which are known to exist. We have such difficulty digesting world-changing information because we are conditioned from birth to expect this information to find its way to us naturally through school and the media. It's hard to imagine these types of historical writings and proceedings would escape the history books unless kept out by the same powerful groups in question.
Do some research yourself, google terms like "Albert Pike satanist", "freemasonry albert pike", "freemasonry founding fathers", etc., and what you find may open your eyes to the fact that our very nation was planted, cultivated, and developed by the same secret societies that control most of the world from behind the curtains, even to this day.
As is customary here, I'm interested in offering you only a taste of topics I feel are important to anyone who wishes to know the truth in a given field. I offer only a taste, and I always challenge you to further research what you find here, as I have no intention of running an information library, only a bulletin board for ideas and interesting facts. In other words, "google it!"
The following is a taste of what I believe is one of the most interesting and telling tales in the history of U.S. politics, military, and the corruption that binds the two together.
What is it, simply put?
Maj. General Smedley Butler, the most highly decorated Marine in U.S. history at the time of his death, was approached by a group of the richest men in the country (world), owners of big business and Wall Street, and propositioned to overthrow the president of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and in doing so, overturn the entire U.S. government.
This is a fairly well-documented case, and General Butler even testified before congress, seeking prosecution of the conspirators who included the Rockefellers, the Duponts, Carnegies, and my personal favorite, Prescott Bush (father of George H.W. Bush).
General Butler was approached by these men and offered $10million and 500,000 soldiers to overthrow the president, placing the corporate elitists officially on the throne of America, and so essentially, the world. Butler declined and took the case public.
What happened? The corporate-owned media made a joke out of the entire story, ridiculing Butler, no charges were pressed, and America went on as usual. No mention of this in text books whatsoever... Strange? I think it would at least be worth a test question for bored high school government students.
A small handful of historians of made various allegations as to the authenticity of Butler's claims regarding the proposition, or the sincerity of it by the conspirators. I personally think someone of such lofty rank and accomplishment would know when someone meant business, especially before he testified to congress. Remember who we're talking about here, a 4-star Major General, the youngest ever in fact. No dummy.
Butler went on to write a Book, "War is a Racket", and lectured across the country on the evils of the Military Industrial Complex, which refers to the billion dollar corporations that rise up through the immense profits associated with wars, and their affinity for manipulating politics without hindrance through their finances and fear.
I always laugh when someone calls me a conspiracy theorist. It's funny because a conspiracy is a secret gathering of people to make a plan for something. Any time a door closes on a conference room sans media coverage, it is a conspiracy by definition, never mind meetings like the Bilderberg conferences. And a theory is kind of an idea you come to when you see evidence to support it. My friend danjo said it best... "There's a conspiracy, but it damn sure ain't a theory."
This is just one of the innumerable stories out there that clearly expose the "conspiracy" by big business and the global elite to overthrow our government and way of life. Perhaps one day, Americans will wake up and see through the facade of Right vs. Left and address the real problem, but until these stories are brought to light, those of us who know the truth will just be the nutty "conspiracy theorists", even if it's conspiracy fact.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
The commandments from the architects of the New World Order. (Wiki Link Here)
Notice that the stones call for the eradication of 90% of the global population.
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.
These stones were set in 1980 in Georgia, by a wealthy man using a pseudonym. They describe the plan of the New World Order, and the laws for post-modern society. Astrological design is impeccable, definitely reminiscent of ancient Babylonian paganism and star worship. This is extremely characteristic of the global elite, as seen from Bohemian Grove.
This is just another piece of evidence displaying how the globalists hide their intentions in plain sight.